A judge orders protection of some evidence in Trump presidential election lawsuit

On Thursday, a judge in Fulton County issued an order to withhold certain evidence in the election interference case involving Donald Trump from public disclosure. This decision was prompted by the leakage of interviews with several witnesses to the media earlier in the week. In response to this breach, District Attorney Fani Willis took action by requesting a comprehensive order that would prevent the release of all evidence that had been provided by prosecutors to defense attorneys. The move reflects a proactive measure to maintain the integrity and confidentiality of the legal proceedings amidst concerns about information leaks to the public.

District Attorney Fani Willis expressed concerns that the public release of evidence in the Donald Trump election interference case could potentially lead to witness harassment, intimidation, or the prejudicing of the jury pool. In response to these concerns, she sought a broad order to prohibit the disclosure of all evidence provided by prosecutors to the defense. However, Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee approved a more measured approach, allowing prosecutors to identify material they consider too sensitive for public release. Under this order, defendants would then have 14 days to challenge the designation of such “sensitive” material.

This decision from the judge comes in the wake of recent leaks where news outlets, including The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, obtained and published excerpts from prosecutors’ videotaped interviews with defendants who have already pleaded guilty in the case. Notably, these interviews involve individuals such as Jenna Ellis, Sidney Powell, Kenneth Chesebro, and Scott Hall, potentially providing insight into their future testimonies as prosecutors pursue charges against the remaining 15 defendants. These individuals were indicted for their alleged roles in attempting to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.


The situation escalated when a defense attorney admitted to leaking the videos to a news outlet, citing the belief that the interviews could benefit his client, former Coffee County election supervisor Misty Hampton. In response to these leaks, Willis renewed her request for a court order prohibiting the release of such sensitive material. The judge’s decision to implement a more targeted order aims to balance the need for transparency with the imperative to safeguard the legal proceedings from potential undue influence or bias.

Defendants in the Donald Trump election interference case raised objections to District Attorney Fani Willis‘ expansive request to bar the release of all evidence provided by prosecutors, a requirement mandated by law. Several news organizations, including the AJC, echoed these objections, contending that such an order was unnecessary. They argued that Willis had not presented evidence of a substantial threat of physical or economic harm to specific witnesses. Additionally, these organizations emphasized that the evidence in question holds significant public interest.

The defendants’ objection suggests a concern about potential limitations on their ability to access evidence for their defense, as restricting the release of all evidence could impact their ability to build a robust case. On the other hand, news organizations are advocating for transparency and public access to information, asserting that the evidence holds significant relevance and importance for the public.

This clash of perspectives highlights the delicate balance that the court must strike between ensuring a fair trial for the defendants and maintaining transparency and public scrutiny in a case of substantial public interest. The arguments put forth by both defendants and news organizations underscore the complex legal and ethical considerations at play in high-profile legal proceedings.

In the recent order issued on Thursday, Judge McAfee acknowledged the need for some protection of information from public disclosure to facilitate the “full and unimpeded” sharing of evidence before the trial. He emphasized that limiting exposure to evidence is crucial to preventing potential jurors from being influenced by information that might be deemed inadmissible during the trial.

Judge McAfee expressed the court’s interest in ensuring that all parties involved retain the right to a fair trial before an impartial jury. He argued that allowing the public to vet every piece of unfiltered evidence months before the trial could compromise this process. As a result, McAfee instructed prosecutors to review evidence already provided to defendants and identify any materials they consider sensitive within a 30-day timeframe. Prosecutors are required to communicate to the defendants why they believe the information is sensitive and make similar determinations for any future evidence provided.

Under this order, defendants have a window of 14 days to contest the “sensitive” designations. Any evidence ultimately labeled as sensitive cannot be filed with the court unless it is sealed. It’s important to note that the order does not prohibit the release of information or records that are publicly available independent of prosecutors providing them to the defendants. This nuanced approach seeks to strike a balance between safeguarding the fairness of the trial process and maintaining transparency within legal proceedings.

Pet Friendly Ice Melt - Pet Safe Salt for Melting Ice and Snow on Driveways, Walkways, and Sidewalks - Ice Salt That's Safe for Pets, Especially Dogs 20 lbs
  • Pet Friendly Ice Melt for Snow: Our pet friendly ice melt for snow is designed to quickly and efficiently melt snow and ice, while being safe for pets to walk on. It's the perfect choice for keeping your pathways clear and safe for everyone in your family, including your pets.
  • Quality is Key: Our snow and ice melt won't sacrifice the quality of standard rock salt for snow and other winter salt products. Paw Protector dog safe salt melt melts snow and ice at temperatures as low as -22 degrees fahrenheit.
  • Keep Your Driveway Clean and Clear: Our ice melt for concrete leaves NO visible residue, unlike other pet safe ice melter products. Avoid excessive stains to concrete to maintain a cleaner appearance!
  • Concrete Safe Ice Melt: Melt snow with a product that is far less corrosive than rock salt and calcium chloride ice melt. Keep your concrete safer from cracks and other winter stresses.
  • Think of your Neighbors: When choosing an ice melt for snow always remember to use a pet friendly product to keep everyone in the neighborhood safe, whether they have four legs or two!
  • Pet Friendly Ice Melt: Our product is designed with your pets' safety in mind. This ice melt is pet friendly, ensuring that it won't harm your furry friends when they come into contact with it during their outdoor adventures.